Over the past few decades, many corporations have broadened their focus from optimizing profits to include social impact.

Today, corporations recognize the importance of aligning values, corporate culture, and their brand with the holistic needs and interests of stakeholders. This shift is evident as many corporations move from making small donations supporting many causes to adopting a purpose-driven approach emphasizing tangible impact. Increasingly, what a corporation chooses to support is closely linked to the causes and concerns that its customers, employees, shareholders, and other stakeholders care about.

Notably, the health and human services sectors have emerged as significant beneficiaries, receiving 26% of all corporate donations over a two-decade span, making them the predominant recipients of such contributions. Understanding the underlying motivations will help your organization navigate the competitive and ever-expanding landscape of corporate philanthropy and develop a sustainable corporate philanthropy program.

In this article, we share steps to uncover these motivations and guide you through building a robust pipeline of corporate prospects, cultivating meaningful relationships, crafting tailored proposals, and implementing a powerful and sustainable corporate philanthropy program.

How Corporations Give

Companies tend to give back to the community in a variety of ways, including:

Company-Sponsored Foundation/Community Grants

Larger companies may have a private foundation linked to their business and aligned with the company’s mission. Gifts are made through a formalized grantmaking application process. Company-sponsored foundations often focus on the geographic areas in which the company is located, the emerging needs of that market, and key priorities or constituent groups that align with the mission.

Matching Gifts

Many companies offer to financially match donations that are contributed by their employees to a nonprofit. The matching ratio will vary per company—from 1:1 up to 4:1. You may find Double the Donation helpful as a matching gift tool for your nonprofit.

Corporate Sponsorships

Corporate sponsorships are a common type of support that nonprofits can receive from a new corporate partner. These sponsorships are typically associated with a form of recognition at a special event or program depending on the gift level.

Employee Volunteer Grants

For employees who give their time back to local nonprofits, some companies award volunteer grants directly to the nonprofit each year based on the number of hours an employee volunteered.

Build a robust pipeline

A sustainable corporate philanthropy program hinges on developing a robust pipeline of qualified prospects to ensure a continual source of substantial funding. It’s imperative to strategically identify corporations aligning with your organization’s mission and values; you might identify organizations whose mandate and interests focus on improving outcomes for vulnerable and underserved populations that overlap with your mission. Utilize existing databases and resources that monitor and track businesses based on geographic areas. Create a list of 10 to 15 well-respected companies in the local community that you want to build a relationship with. Start with the “About” page on the company’s website and branch out from there.

Consider the following questions:

  • What are the company’s goals, vision, and values? How do they align with your mission?
  • What community issues touch their business?
  • Who from the organization could be a good first contact? Consider a member of the CSR team, Foundation team, community engagement, etc.
  • What is the company’s CSR strategy or giving focus areas?
  • Has the company been in the news recently for a philanthropic investment? If so, what organizations are they supporting and at what level?

Understand Corporate Motivations

Understanding the underlying motivations that drive a corporation’s philanthropic efforts allows you to adapt your fundraising approach accordingly. Corporations are often motivated by marketing and brand alignment or employee satisfaction. Delving into their corporate landscape—including the impact on employees, customers, and stakeholders—offers invaluable insights and a high-level understanding of their values and how they may be philanthropically motivated.

Look at Yourself From Their Perspective

As you seek to uncover corporate prospects, it is equally important to consider how these corporate prospects perceive your organization. There can often be a lack of understanding about why an organization needs philanthropic support. Highlight how philanthropy impacts programs and services and tell that story of impact clearly and compellingly.

Identify and Connect

Next, explore existing connections to key decision-makers within your target corporations. Networking is a valuable tool for accessing and establishing initial contact. Identify individuals who bridge, facilitate introductions, and open doors—personal connections enhance the credibility of your approach.

The power of volunteers to amplify your prospect identification efforts cannot be overstated. Volunteers, including board members and other stakeholders, can play a pivotal role in identifying organizations whose business interests intersect with the populations positively impacted by your services. Their insights and networks expand the reach of your prospect identification process.

These steps culminate in a prospect pipeline that transcends wishful thinking and becomes meaningful and measurable. This comprehensive approach ensures that your identification efforts engage corporations with a capacity that aligns closely with your mission, values, and impact objectives.

Cultivating Strategies for Corporate Philanthropy

Cultivation is not a linear process but a strategic journey to foster genuine connections and long-term partnerships built on mutual trust. Cultivation moves the prospect closer to a successful gift request and creates a relationship founded on shared values and purpose.

To embark on this journey, gather historical and relevant information before creating a cultivation strategy. It is common to see organizations collaborating with corporations across various dimensions like sponsorship, vendor relationships, community engagement, marketing, and media relations. Consult your organization’s compliance and legal departments to ensure an approach doesn’t trigger conflicts of interest. Understanding the breadth of any existing or anticipated corporate partnership or relationship is important before establishing a cultivation strategy.

Initiate this process by identifying the 6Rs of cultivation.

Right prospectRight purposeRight amountRight
timing
Right solicitorRelevant factors or interests

This framework forms the foundation of a cultivation strategy. Invite subject matter experts and intentionally engage them during the cultivation process. If your corporate partner is enthusiastic about a particular service line or program, engage critical stakeholders or volunteers to answer questions and provide additional context.

Preparing for the request

If your organization has multiple locations or member organizations, consider creating one comprehensive approach for each corporate partner to eliminate internal competition and provide a unified and comprehensive request.

In the intricate dance of corporate philanthropy, crafting a proposal is more than a transaction; it is an art form that requires insight and strategic finesse. The pivotal precursor to unveiling your proposal is the briefing meeting, an opportunity to test the ask and gain a nuanced understanding of donor interests.

The briefing meeting is not just a formality but a strategic move to gauge the donor’s level of interest and specific goals. It serves as a crucial checkpoint to avoid surprises when the proposal arrives. From estimating capacity, preferred timing, and understanding their decision-making process, the timing of their budgetary process, and the insights gathered during the meeting pave the way for a timely, uniquely personal, and tailored proposal for your prospect.

Questions to keep in mind as you approach the request include:

  • Is there an application process?
  • Who are the decision-makers?
  • Does a request need to be presented to a board?
  • Is the corporation a local entity of a larger corporation? If so, which are we approaching?

The proposal

Proposals are personalized invitations to a collaborative partnership that creates real impact. Enriched by insights from the briefing meeting, the tailored pitch transforms a generic proposal into an inspiring and collaborative venture—a journey both parties embark on with a shared purpose.

A compelling proposal is a narrative that paints a vivid picture of long-term impact. It provides a detailed overview of the mission, clearly identifying the problem and conveying the consequences of inaction. It also clearly articulates the long-term vision, illustrating how the gift will contribute to achieving these objectives and making a tangible difference.

In personalized storytelling, it is often more compelling to “show” than to “tell.” A winning proposal often will captivate its audience by demonstrating the impact that can be achieved through investment, going beyond abstract ideas to share proof of concept instead. Acknowledging your corporate partner and their values, a strong proposal goes beyond a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach and can highlight a deep understanding of their unique identity and aspirations.

Stewarding Corporate Relationships

Stewardship is essential to retaining and strengthening relationships with corporate donors. Collaborate closely with your corporate partners to create a stewardship plan meaningful to them. Whether they prefer impact reports, leadership updates, or in-person meetings, it is important not to apply a blanket approach to stewarding these relationships.

corporate fundraising is an investment—but it’s worth it!

Securing major gifts from corporations is about fostering enduring partnerships that create real impact. From building a robust pipeline to impactful recognition, each step contributes to a shared vision of positive change.

In this dynamic and competitive landscape of philanthropy, each step is a commitment to exploring a partnership model to its fullest. Transformative gifts from corporations are increasingly possible but require earnest planning and strategic thought. Investment in people and processes can move your organization from transactional small investments to transformative, long-term alliances that propel your growth.

Forecasting fundraising revenue can be difficult in any given year, especially in 2024, as the economy fluctuates and a presidential election looms. Amid so much uncertainty about the future, it helps to center your forecasting exercises around the following fundamental principles using our downloadable fundraising revenue forecast template.

  • With so much unknown, focus on what you do know. As fundraisers, what we know is our donors—we know who they are, how they’ve given, and when they’ve given. We can use this information to make educated assumptions about how they might give next year.
  • Focus on the funding sources disproportionately impacting the total funds raised. The Pareto Principle applies to many nonprofits, where 80-90% of funds come from 10-20% of donors. If you can understand what this top percentage of donors gives, you can better understand the following year’s fundraising revenue.

Combine our template with the following tips to develop your 2024 fundraising strategies.

Step 1: Get the Lay of the Land

Before making fundraising revenue projections, set yourself up for success by looking at the following resources.

Historic Philanthropic and Fundraising Data

It can be helpful to get an idea of the broader philanthropic landscape for overall giving statistics while keeping in mind that donors continue giving generously despite fluctuating economies. Further, Giving USA projects that total giving will increase in 2024 and 2025. It’s helpful to have this information as a backdrop for your projections.

If you’re on a computer, click on the three ellipses below and then the desktop icon to expand the graph. If you’re on your phone, pinch to zoom in and out.

Similarly, you should spend significant time understanding your own fundraising and donor dataWe recommend starting with these basics, but you can pull additional pertinent information into your projections.

Year-Over-Year Total Funds Raised for at Least the Past Five Years

This data around your year-over-year revenue for the previous five years helps you understand your baseline. If you have data going back further than five years, that’s even better for forecasting purposes.

Top Current and Potential Donors and Their Giving Histories

Compile a list of donors (individuals, corporations, and foundations) with the potential to give $10,000 or more in 2024, including prospects who have given $5,000 or more in the past, along with high-scoring donors from your wealth screening ratings.

Subtotals by Method and Revenue Stream

To understand your revenue, look at the funds received by each method. Your revenue streams may include major gift solicitations, online fundraising, direct mail, or grant applications.

Last Year’s Gift

List the number of donors at each giving level in this chart, as a historic gift table is key to understanding your revenue breakdown.

Step 2: forecast revenue from Top Donors

Once you have your data, focus on predicting revenue from your top donor group. Remember, your best prospects are those who have already given generously to your organization.

Set Up a Tracking Worksheet

Given the importance of these few donors, track every top donor by name using the first tab of our fundraising revenue forecast template. This worksheet will allow you to note each donor’s historical giving, what you plan to ask them for in 2024, and what you think they’ll donate.

If you’re on a computer, click on the three ellipses below and then the desktop icon to expand the table. If you’re on your phone, pinch to zoom in and out.

Note: The data in the table below is fictitious and for illustrative purposes only.

Estimate Each Donor’s 2024 Gift

Remember that what you expect a donor to give differs from the amount you ask for. We recommend being conservative with gift projections but optimistic with request amounts. Fluctuating economic conditions don’t mean you can’t aim high and be bold in gift requests—your mission is always important. Still, it’s best to be conservative in estimating a likely 2024 gift.

  • To start, look at the donor’s past giving and recent behavior.
  • Consider your organization’s “batting average” for gift requests. Historically, how much did funders give compared to what was asked of them?
  • Use research resources like wealth screening tools WealthEngine or iWave to gain context on a prospect’s financial capacity. Or reach out to us about our data analytics services that layer wealth screening results with custom affinity models to provide you with the most accurate estimates and precise insights.

Have a Personal Conversation with a Top Donor

Remember that the best indicators of what a donor might give come from personal conversations with the donor. Calling your top donors to check in is a great stewardship practice. During these calls, you can deduce the donor’s giving potential for the upcoming year. Additionally, these conversations can set up the next step: scheduling a solicitation meeting.

Step 3: Make a Plan for Each fundraising Revenue Stream

Once you have established projections for your top donors, it’s time to look at other fundraising revenue streams. Tab two of our fundraising revenue forecast template will help you track this information. For each revenue stream, look back at its past performance at your organization, then combine that organizational information with current industry trends.

Note: The data in the table below is fictitious and for illustrative purposes only.

Below are some overall trends we see. Remember that these trends are not universal for all organizations—even organizations of similar missions, sizes, and locations see their fundraising evolve uniquely.

Individual Major Gifts and Foundations

Giving by individuals remains the largest source of philanthropy in the US, and according to The Philanthropy Outlook 2024 & 2025, individual/household giving is predicted to increase by 2.6% in 2024 and by 3.4% in 2025.

Corporate Giving

Corporate philanthropy has remained steady in the last few years despite a fluctuating economy, the pandemic, and various worldwide crises. Growth of the Gross Domestic Product, a strong labor market, and low unemployment have strengthened this fundraising area, and corporate giving is predicted to increase by 1.9% in 2024 and by 2.6% in 2025, although these numbers are predicted to be below the historical 10-year, 25-year, and 40-year annualized average growth rates for this sector.

Direct Mail

Direct mail remains an effective fundraising strategy, with almost half of the surveyed organizations in the 2024 Philanthropy Pulse citing direct mailings as a donor engagement tactic. We suggest projecting flat or slightly increased totals here.

Online Giving

Digital giving has been trending up, as evidenced by the 63% of donors who prefer to give online via credit or debit card. We suggest projecting a mild increase, especially if your organization is undertaking digital marketing campaigns and harnessing events like #GivingTuesday.

Special Events

We advise being conservative with estimates around this engagement strategy, even though events are still a top donor retention strategy for 71% of nonprofits.

Bequests

Although bequest giving has declined recently, it remains a widely used gifting vehicle. Therefore, it’s best to plan conservatively.

Non-Bequest Planned Gifts

These gift types may see an increase. For example, donor-advised funds (DAFs) are on the rise, and The Philanthropic Trust estimates that DAFs now hold assets upward of $228 billion. We would therefore advise planning for an increase in non-bequest planned gifts in 2024.

Step 4: Put It All Together in a Gift Table

Next, use tab three of our fundraising revenue forecast template to bring all these data points together on your gifts table.

If you’re on a computer, click on the three ellipses below and then the desktop icon to expand the table. If you’re on your phone, pinch to zoom in and out.

Note: The data in the table below is fictitious and for illustrative purposes only.

The example above shows that most funds (95%) are projected to come from 12 donors. If we focus on accurately projecting these 12 donors’ gifts and making sure these gift projections come to fruition, we’ll be in good shape for 2024. Of course, we still need to get direct mail out the door, launch our online appeals, and fulfill the rest of our fundraising plans, but the bulk of our focus should be on the top part of this gift table.

Step 5: Turn Your Plan into Action

Now, it’s time to determine how to make your gift projections a reality. Tab four of our fundraising revenue forecast template will help plot out your projections month by month.

Keep This in Mind When Building Your Fundraising Revenue Timeline

  • For top donors, the next gift will often be a year out from their last gift. For foundations, the foundation granting cycle will inform timing.
  • You can also plot out the dates of your direct mail appeals and big online giving campaigns, so you know when to expect surges in revenue from these sources.
  • Plotting out sources like bequests is difficult, but most of your revenue should be anticipated in the chart.

Our fundraising revenue timeline template, as shown in the example below, helps you compare projections versus reality. You’ll know early on if you were too conservative or optimistic in your projections. After reviewing your progress, you can adjust your projections for the remainder of the year as appropriate.

If you’re on a computer, click on the three ellipses below and then the desktop icon to expand the table. If you’re on your phone, pinch to zoom in and out.

Note: The data in the table below is fictitious and for illustrative purposes only.

Tips for Successful Fundraising Predictions

Keep the following principles in mind as you continue planning for 2024 and adjusting your course as the year progresses.

  • Take time to pull and organize data and look at key trends.
  • Focus on your top donors.
  • Be optimistic with gift requests but conservative in projections.
  • Lay your projections on a timeline so you can adjust in real time.

Happy forecasting!

Planning for the future of your organization’s fundraising?

CCS offers a suite of services related to organizational planning and fundraising strategy.

Research on how the US presidential election years impact giving is limited. We should look thoughtfully at 2020, the last election cycle, as the COVID-19 pandemic had unprecedented effects on the economy and how Americans gave. The following is what the data suggests about philanthropy in election years.

Philanthropy for Enhanced Democracy

While we don’t know if charitable giving will mimic 2020, recent grants indicate that donors, including mega donors, are willing to give to increase voter participation. The Open Society Foundations granted $50 million in December 2023 to encourage young people and women to vote, while MacKenzie Scott gave $10 million to the State Infrastructure Fund for increased voting participation and protected voting rights.

Aggregate giving in election years

The 2023 Philanthropic Landscape reveals that charitable giving increased in nine of the last 10 presidential election years, save for 2008 during the global financial crisis.  The charitable giving numbers for an election year tend to follow the trajectory seen in previous years, whether it is an upward or a downward trend. This trend has been observed despite variety in elected candidates, and thus indicates that philanthropy has and will remain resilient despite election outcomes.

Political Giving as a Share of All Giving

In the final few months of each presidential election, political giving spikes as a percentage of total giving, then resettles to lower levels shortly afterward. In more recent presidential election years, political giving appears to make up an increasingly large percentage of all giving during the months surrounding the election. The increasing share of giving during election seasons dovetails with other research that more and more Americans donate to political candidates over time. According to American National Election Studies (ANES) data, 12% of US adults say they donated to a political candidate in 2016.

Does Political Giving “Crowd Out” Individual Charitable Giving?

While political giving appears to be around $2.7 billion so far for the 2024 election year, it represents a small fraction of charitable giving, estimated to total $499.33 billion in 2023.

Though it may seem logical that donors of political campaigns may give less to charity in an election year, there is little empirical evidence to support this. In fact, a study by Blackbaud suggested that in the 2012 election, donors who gave to presidential and other federal candidates (as tracked by the Federal Election Commission) tended to increase their overall donations to charity that year.

“Rage Giving” After Presidential Elections

Following the 2016 election, the media widely reported increased donations to politically progressive causes, coined “rage giving.” Several small studies support that donors may be more inclined to donate to causes associated with the losing candidate’s party following a presidential election than they otherwise would be. While many of these studies have relatively small sample sizes and tend to focus on online giving—which grew by 42% between 2019 and 2021—the research provides some empirical evidence for the phenomenon of “rage giving.”

A Chronicle of Philanthropy analysis suggests that a similar phenomenon has occurred during at least three other elections. On average, nonprofits associated with the opposite political ideology of the winning presidential candidate saw a 57.55% increase in contributions compared to the previous year. Organizations associated with the same ideology as the new president saw an average 2.9% decrease in contributions.

Our Advice for fundraising in an election year

While it may be impossible to fully predict how a presidential election will impact philanthropic giving, we can offer insight into successfully engaging with your donors amidst the political climate.

Continue Fundraising Efforts

More than $3 billion was donated to the two major party candidates in the 2020 election, leading to concern about the competition that political giving may pose to charitable giving. While it is important to research the political giving of your largest donors before major requests, history tells us that donors continue supporting their favorite charitable causes during an election year. Record numbers of Americans voted in the 2020 presidential election; the sheer number of voters is an exciting indicator of increased civic engagement in the US, potentially having ripple effects on charitable giving and volunteering.

Practice Empathy and Awareness

Remember that emotions may run high, especially given the increased voter turnout during the last election. It is essential for charitable organizations to lead with empathy when communicating with donors, staff, and volunteers. Stay aware of how the election results may affect the lives of those closest to your organization.

Remain Committed to Your Mission and Communicate With Donors

Now is a time to reaffirm your organization’s mission, purpose, and values. If your mission was relevant before the election, it will be relevant afterward. With this idea in mind, continue donor communications, thoughtfully articulating your cause’s relevance to today’s world. Americans are passionate about various causes, from the environment to the arts to human services. These passions continue regardless of election outcomes, policy changes, and other societal factors.

Americans are generous, no matter the political climate

Today, as always, charitable giving is a way for Americans to support the values they cherish and empower the organizations that contribute to their communities and the world.

To get more data on philanthropy in the US, download CCS Fundraising’s latest Philanthropic Landscape, 12th edition.

More Insights

Video

2025 Philanthropy Pulse Webinar: Data-Driven Insights Shaping the Future of Giving

Wednesday, February 12, 2025

Join us for an exclusive webinar, where we will unveil key insights from the 4th edition of our annual CCS Philanthropy Pulse Report.

Article

Maximizing Fundraising Opportunities in South Florida

December 18, 2024

South Florida is experiencing great philanthropic growth, and the momentum looks likely to continue well into the future. In this article, we help you understand the most important trends and components of the philanthropic landscape that will help you maximize fundraising opportunities in South Florida.

Download the Human Services Spotlight infographic, or explore the 2024 Philanthropy Pulse report in its entirety.


This Human Services Sector Spotlight is adapted from CCS’s 2024 Philanthropy Pulse report to provide an in-depth look at the data provided by 143 survey respondents from that sector.

fundraising practices

Following an 8% three-year decrease in human service nonprofit revenue in 2022, most human services organizations (59%) report revenue increases vs. their prior fiscal year, as compared to 57% across all sectors. Just over half (53%) of organizations get 20% or less of their giving in the form of non-cash assets, which is the highest rate among each of the other sectors.

Just over half (53%) of human services organizations anticipate no change in their fundraising revenue in the coming year as a result of the upcoming election and pending public policies. While it is certainly important to research the political giving of your largest donors in advance of major requests, know that history tells us that donors continue to support their favorite charitable causes during an election year.

trends in funding priorities

In the past twelve months, organizations saw an increase in demand or outsized growth of funding for the following specific services.

human services sector projections and priorities

Sixty-seven percent (67%) of participants expect major and mid-level gifts and annual appeals to increase in 2024. Organizations might consider using wealth screening and an RFM analysis to mine your prospect list for meaningful opportunities, particularly after many human service nonprofits expanded their donor databases during COVID-19 crisis support. Seventy-five percent (75%) of respondents believe DEI is important to define their organization’s values, compared to 77% across sectors.

staffing and resourcing in the human services sector

In 2023, 38% of responding human services organizations increased their fundraising staff, compared to about one-third across sectors. This is also the highest rate among each of the other sectors. While 68% of all organizations increased staff pay by 1-10% over the past three years, 69% of organizations in this sector saw an increase. While seeking to attract talented staff, human service nonprofits might consider highlighting this figure and challenging other assumptions at the onset of the recruitment process.

donor acquisition and retention

Fifty-four percent (54%) of organizations indicate that their number of new donors has increased in the past 12 months, which is similar to 57% across sectors. Forty-four percent (44%) of organizations report retaining over half of their new donors over the past 12 months, compared to 67% overall. Human services nonprofits might consider leveraging specialized legacy societies as a powerful donor acquisition and retention tool.

human services data and technology

Sixty-four percent (64%) of participants describe their organization’s reporting and analytics capabilities at a leading level or higher of sophistication, versus 58% across sectors. While 58% of all organizations have not addressed the use of AI technology in their operations, 54% in this sector have not. Human services nonprofits could leverage guiding questions to implement AI in their fundraising practices.


The data on this page was curated from a questionnaire taken by over 600 responding organizations during the fall of 2023, reporting on FY23 results.


This Arts and Culture Sector Spotlight is adapted from CCS’s 2024 Philanthropy Pulse report to provide an in-depth look at the data provided by 58 survey respondents from that sector. A variety of arts and culture organizations are represented in this year’s report.

fundraising practices

Most arts and culture institutions (59%) report revenue increases vs. their prior fiscal year, as compared to 57% across all sectors. About half (47%) of organizations get 20% or less of their giving in the form of noncash assets, despite evidence that nonprofits accepting non-cash donations grow nearly five times faster on average than organizations accepting only cash gifts.

arts & culture projections and priorities

At least 64% of participants expect major and mid-level gifts and annual appeals to increase in 2024. Seventy-one percent (71%) believe DEI is important to define their organization’s values, compared to 77% across sectors. Embracing inclusivity and focusing on DEI issues can be crucial for engaging next-gen donors who prioritize global issues embedded in the arts and culture sector, such as social justice and free expression​​.

staffing and resourcing in the arts & culture sector

In 2023, 29% of participating organizations increased their fundraising staff, compared to about one-third across sectors. While 68% of all organizations increased staff pay by 1-10% over the past three years, 69% of organizations in this sector saw an increase. Beyond fundraising staff, many arts and culture organizations are turning to their board members for additional advancement support.

donor acquisition and retention

Sixty percent (60%) of organizations indicate that their number of new donors has increased in the past 12 months, as compared to 57% across sectors. Fifty-three percent (53%) of organizations report retaining over half of their new donors over the past 12 months, compared to 67% overall.

The introduction of flexible donation options like ‘Donate Now, Pay Later’ might be beneficial, especially in engaging a broader range of donors​​. Many arts and culture institutions are also rethinking their membership strategies by segmenting members as either transaction-motivated or mission-motivated. Using segmentation can help inform your tailored approach to fundraising and communication for each type of member. Moreover, CCS has found more effective prospecting through donor segmentation with our clients.

arts & culture data and technology

Half of the participants describe their organization’s reporting and analytics capabilities at a leading level or higher of sophistication, versus 58% across sectors. While 58% of all organizations have not addressed the use of AI technology in their operations, 72% in this sector have not. This poses a huge opportunity for arts and culture institutions: the use of AI in identifying prospective donors, generating donor narratives, and other applications for authentic relationships can offer significant support​​.


The data on this page was curated from a questionnaire taken by over 600 responding organizations during the fall of 2023, reporting on FY23 results.


This Faith Sector Spotlight is adapted from CCS’s 2024 Philanthropy Pulse report to provide an in-depth look at the data provided by 50 survey respondents from that sector.

Respondents representing a congregation, house of worship, or parish constituted the most common (47%) type of survey participant. The four most common religious affiliations included Roman Catholic (57%), Anglican/Episcopal (18%), Jewish (8%), and Presbyterian (8%).

fundraising practices

Just under half (48%) of all religious organizations report revenue increases vs. their prior fiscal year, as compared to 57% across all sectors. The majority (52%) of organizations get 20% or less of their giving in the form of noncash assets.

Eighty-one percent (81%) of religious institutions achieved 0-20% of their endowment in 2023. Religious institutions might consider leveraging endowment fundraising tactics from the education sector to inform an alternative approach to sustainable funding.

religious institutions’ projections and priorities

Fifty-two percent (52%) of participants expect major and mid-level gifts and annual appeals to increase in 2024. With a renewed focus on digital giving, faith-based organizations might consider highlighting faith-based values in online communications. For example, Jewish synagogues could include a Tzedakah donation page on their website.

Sixty-eight percent (68%) of respondents believe DEI is important to define their organization’s values, compared to 77% across sectors.

To support pastoral planning, houses of worship participated in a myriad of staff exercises (below). Religious leadership could leverage our seven steps for planning, implementing, and integrating a visioning workshop at their congregation.

staffing and resourcing in the faith sector

In 2023, 18% of responding organizations increased their fundraising staff, compared to about one-third across sectors. While 68% of all organizations increased staff pay by 1-10% over the past three years, 48% of organizations in this sector saw an increase. In one national survey of Christian institutions, 37% cited staff recruitment and retention as their top challenge. Improved benefits, increased pay, and a focus on staff referrals may help support funding and retaining top talent at your faith institution.

donor acquisition and retention

Sixty-four percent (64%) of organizations indicate that their number of new donors has increased in the past 12 months, as compared to 57% across sectors. Sixty-four percent (64%) of organizations report retaining over half of their new donors over the past 12 months, compared to 67% overall. Faith-based institutions might consider leveraging specialized legacy societies as a powerful donor acquisition and retention tool.

Notably, 66% of Catholic respondents achieved over 80% of their annual stewardship appeal goal. Successful parishes leverage peer-to-peer strategies and archdiocesan resources to ensure an efficient approach to fundraising.

data and technology in the faith sector

Forty-eight percent (48%) of participants describe their organization’s reporting and analytics capabilities at a leading level or higher of sophistication, versus 58% across sectors. While 58% of all organizations have not addressed the use of AI technology in their operations, 70% in this sector have not. Faith institutions could could leverage guiding questions to implement AI in their fundraising practices.
 


The data on this page was curated from a questionnaire taken by over 600 responding organizations during the fall of 2023, reporting on FY23 results.

Download the Higher Education Spotlight infographic, or explore the 2024 Philanthropy Pulse report in its entirety.


This Higher Education Sector Spotlight is adapted from CCS’s 2024 Philanthropy Pulse report to provide an in-depth look at the data provided by 56 survey respondents from that sector. The most recent data reports that higher education institutions witnessed a notable 12.5% increase in philanthropic donations, reaching $59.50 billion, with significant growth in donations directed towards restricted endowments, largely for scholarships, and academic research.

A variety of higher education organizations are represented in this year’s report.

fundraising practices

Most institutions (63%) report revenue increases vs. their prior fiscal year, which is the highest rate among each of the other sectors and the combined rate (57%). About two in five (43%) schools get 20% or less of their giving in the form of noncash assets. Though often overlooked, there is potential in retirement assets for charitable giving; institutions of higher education might consider focusing on noncash donation vehicles that offer personal financial advantages during major gift conversations.

Most funding for institutions of higher education comes from major gifts, followed by foundation and corporate grants. Notably, 11% of all corporate giving over the past 20 years has gone towards higher education.

higher education projections and priorities

Seventy-seven (77%) of participants expect major and mid-level gifts and annual appeals to increase in 2024, which is the greatest rate when compared to other sectors. Likewise, seventy-seven (77%) of respondents believe DEI is important to define their school’s values, which is the same percentage reflected across sectors. Fundraising for DEI initiatives at colleges and universities will remain a key link between school values and DEI outcomes, such as the growing need for support reflected in a recent national survey.

staffing and resourcing in the higher education sector

In 2023, 29% of responding institutions increased their fundraising staff, compared to about one-third across sectors. While 68% of all organizations increased staff pay by 1-10% over the past three years, 75% of schools in this sector saw an increase. Managing fundraising efficiency and staff ratios in light of these evolving sector dynamics remains an important way to maximize ROI and employee satisfaction.

donor acquisition and retention

Alumni continue to be a key source of new and existing donors among institutions of higher education. The top three alumni engagement strategies include alumni reunions/events (59%), annual giving campaigns (50%), and targeted digital communications (43%).

Forty-five percent (45%) of higher education institutions indicate that their number of new donors has increased in the past 12 months, as compared to 57% across sectors. Colleges and universities might consider sourcing new donors by re-engaging those closest to their organization, including board members and faculty.

Fifty percent (50%) of schools report retaining over half of their new donors over the past 12 months, compared to 67% overall.

data and technology in higher education fundraising

Sixty-one percent (61%) of participants describe their organization’s reporting and analytics capabilities at a leading level or higher of sophistication, versus 58% across sectors. In recent years, great strides have been made at universities across the country to develop comprehensive data management protocols.

The two most common measures of efficacy and performance tracked by institutions of higher education are the number of new gifts (76%) and the number of proposals/solicitations (69%). While 58% of all organizations have not addressed the use of AI technology in their operations, 70% in this sector have not.


The data on this page was curated from a questionnaire taken by over 600 responding organizations during the fall of 2023, reporting on FY23 results.

This Primary and Secondary Education Sector Spotlight is adapted from CCS’s 2024 Philanthropy Pulse report to provide an in-depth look at the data provided by 89 survey respondents from that sector.

fundraising practices

Most schools (55%) report revenue increases vs. their prior fiscal year, as compared to 57% across all sectors. According to NAIS Facts at a Glance, the median funds received were $1.4 million for independent schools.

Just under half (49%) of schools get 20% or less of their giving in the form of non-cash assets. Overall, schools’ fundraising revenue was led by the annual fund (42%), followed by the below sources:

annual fund updates for primary and secondary education

Most primary and secondary schools (62%) report that they never or rarely receive multi-year commitments to their annual fund. Schools might consider performing a wealth screening and RFM analysis in order to discover existing donors who might be interested in such a major commitment.

Of all sources, responding schools’ annual fund support comes mostly from parents (32%). Evolutions in donor sources for your type of school may offer additional insights for segmenting and engaging donors.

projections and priorities for primary and secondary schools

Sixty-four percent (64%) of participants expect major and mid-level gifts and annual appeals to increase in 2024. Eighty-four percent (84%) of respondents believe DEI is important to define their school’s values, compared to 77% across sectors. This is the highest rate among each of the other sectors, a trend that gained particular momentum in recent years and was evident in last year’s report.

staffing and resourcing in the primary and secondary school sector

In 2023, 30% of responding schools increased their fundraising staff, compared to about one-third across sectors. While 68% of all organizations increased staff pay by 1-10% over the past three years, 78% of schools in this sector saw an increase. This is the highest increase among each of the other sectors. Notably, the median salaries for directors of advancement and directors of development for 2023 were $147,950 and $120,000, respectively.

donor acquisition and retention

Forty-eight (48%) of schools indicate that their number of new donors has increased in the past 12 months, as compared to 57% across sectors. Fifty-six percent (56%) of schools report retaining over half of their new donors over the past 12 months, compared to 67% overall. Whether or not your school is in the position to campaign, key tactics like strengthening your culture of philanthropy and establishing a major gift initiative can help onboard and sustain key supporters.

data and technology for primary and secondary schools

Sixty-five percent (65%) of participants describe their school’s reporting and analytics capabilities at a leading level or higher of sophistication, which surpasses all other sectors individually and the 58% reported across sectors collectively. While 58% of all organizations have not addressed the use of AI technology in their operations, 55% in this sector have not.


The data on this page was curated from a questionnaire taken by over 600 responding organizations during the fall of 2023, reporting on FY23 results.


This Health Sector Spotlight is adapted from CCS’s 2024 Philanthropy Pulse report to provide an in-depth look at the data provided by 82 survey respondents from that sector.

Survey respondents represented the following types of healthcare organizations:


fundraising practices

About half of healthcare institutions (49%) report revenue increases vs. their prior fiscal year, as compared to 57% across all sectors. Two out of every five (41%) healthcare organizations get 20% or less of their giving in the form of non-cash assets. Healthcare nonprofits might consider corporate funding partnerships with digital health startups: nonprofits would align with industry-focused and tech-forward initiatives, and healthcare companies would partner with mission-aligned efforts to appeal to their value-based investors.

Just over half (54%) of healthcare organizations organize fundraising efforts (e.g., major gifts, annual funds) by a combination of geography (3%), hospital facility (5%), and service line (8%). Others (32%) organize their efforts by other means, such as fundraising channels.

Most (33%) fundraising revenue comes from major gifts. Healthcare fundraising professionals might consider establishing a regular cadence of meetings with major donors, with trackable goals and outcomes, to ensure a steady stream of potential opportunities. On average, fundraising revenue at healthcare institutions comes from the following sources:

Most (61%) respondents have fully centralized fundraising operations, as compared to 3% who are fully decentralized. Fourteen percent (14%) are becoming more centralized, while 2% are transitioning to more of the latter. Still, 17% report being hybrid.

health sector projections and priorities

Seventy-three percent (73%) of participants expect major and mid-level gifts and annual appeals to increase in 2024. Eighty-four percent (84%) of respondents believe DEI is important to define their organization’s values, compared to 77% across sectors. Various tactics for understanding the needs of your community, including asking emergency room physicians about health equity issues, could offer direction for fundraising needs to align your actions with your values.

staffing and resourcing in the health sector

In 2023, 34% of responding healthcare institutions increased their fundraising staff, which is similar to rates across sectors. While 68% of all organizations increased staff pay by 1-10% over the past three years, 73% of organizations in this sector saw an increase. Healthcare nonprofits might consider creating opportunities for upward mobility and other tactics to support staff amidst a fast-paced and high-achieving work environment.

The top two engagement tactics for physician’s involvement in fundraising efforts include participating in recognition and stewardship efforts (35%) and participating in outreach initiatives (33%). One-third (33%) of institutions report that physicians are not engaged in their fundraising efforts.

donor acquisition and retention in the health sector

Sixty-five percent (65%) of healthcare organizations indicate that their number of new donors has increased in the past 12 months, which is the highest rate among each of the other sectors, and 7% greater than all sectors combined. Thirty-five (35%) of institutions report retaining over half of their new donors over the past 12 months, compared to 67% overall. Healthcare nonprofits might consider leveraging specialized legacy societies as a powerful donor acquisition and retention tool.

data and technology at healthcare institutions

Sixty percent (60%) of participants describe their organization’s reporting and analytics capabilities at a leading level or higher of sophistication, versus 58% across sectors. While 58% of all organizations have not addressed the use of AI technology in their operations, only half (51%) in this sector have not. Healthcare nonprofits could ask themselves guiding questions to implement AI in their fundraising practices.

The data on this page was curated from a questionnaire taken by over 600 responding organizations during the fall of 2023, reporting on FY23 results.

A commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) should be essential to advancement professionals who have a responsibility in how they acquire, store, and use data. DEI is not a one-and-done concept and should be at the heart of everything a nonprofit does— especially regarding donor data.

Vered Siegel, Senior Director at CCS Fundraising and Chair of the Association of Advancement Services Professionals (aasp)’s DEI in Advancement Data Task Force, and Felecia McCree, Senior Director on CCS’s Systems & Change Management team and member of the task force, addressed this very subject in aasp’s 2024 eBook, Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI) for Advancement Services: Best Practices for Today’s Success. We asked them to expound on why and how advancement services should integrate DEI principles.

Q: Why should DEI matter to those in Advancement Services?

A headshot of Vered Siegel.

Vered: Ultimately, Advancement Services as a profession owns and is responsible for constituent biographical data in the fundraising database. To this end, DEI is a lens by which to look at our donors’ and prospects’ identities:

  • How do they define themselves, and how does our institution define them? Are those definitions aligned?
  • How does responsibility for identity data impact our fundraising success, our relationships with constituents, and our team’s strategy?

I think it comes down to promoting human dignity: accepting other people’s identities as part of the big picture of human flourishing. I got into the nonprofit sector because I felt called to promote that flourishing. Society commonly misjudges “data people” as disconnected from the humans our data reflects, but it’s absolutely untrue. We are the stewards of identity in data form.

Q: Why should organizations think about DEI in data collection, usage, and storage?

A headshot of Vered Siegel.

Vered: Splitting best practice recommendations across collection, storage, and usage in Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI) for Advancement Services: Best Practices for Today’s Success was critical because every organization is on a unique timeline in its DEI data management. For example, some organizations might read the document and notice that they align well with best practices in storage but haven’t considered all the implications of collection. By separating these three content areas, we reject the premise that if you’re early in your journey in one area, the rest is insurmountable. On the contrary—I think every organization can identify at least one area where they are at the cutting edge of the best practice today, even if the checklist for the rest might be quite long.

Q: What can we learn from equitable data practices?

A headshot of Felecia McCree.

Felecia: It is important to increase representation whenever possible—we continue to learn about disparities in past datasets that have led to inaccuracies in predictions, analytics, and outcomes. When organizations embrace equitable data practices, they become better informed in making decisions that impact all segments of the communities they serve. It allows them to consider everyone impacted by their analytical findings and recommendations, which is crucial for fostering inclusivity.

Equitable data practices can also help uncover hidden biases, helping nonprofits mitigate the risk of perpetuating disparities in underserved communities, and ensuring that future decisions are based on data that accurately reflects the diversity of their constituents.

Q: How does DEI help nonprofits better use their data?

A headshot of Felecia McCree.

Felecia: Nonprofits can only benefit when their accumulated donor data accurately reflects the communities they serve. That’s because it can lead to more targeted, effective, and inclusive outreach to those who will directly benefit from program offerings and services.

Additionally, DEI principles can help guide the ethical management of sensitive personal information. It is becoming more important than ever to protect the rights and privacy of those who are vulnerable to attack based on their gender identities or ethnic backgrounds.

Q: Are there any common mistakes nonprofits make when implementing DEI efforts in their databases?

A headshot of Vered Siegel.

Vered: Yes—I think the most common mistake nonprofits make to meet the moment is to focus effort and energy on collecting a large amount of data with no plan. It’s a well-intentioned mistake. The thought behind it is that even if you don’t know what you’d do with data about someone’s race or gender identity, it might come to use one day. But, I challenge nonprofits to consider the effort and energy expended in pursuing a data-maximalist ideology. If you’ve never needed it before, and it takes a great deal of time, effort, energy, and money to obtain and store, yet you have no plan for what to do with the data once you have it, was pursuing it really worth it?

Q: We know from the 2024 CCS Philanthropy Pulse report that many nonprofits struggle with communicating with donors about DEI. Do you have any advice for them?

A headshot of Vered Siegel.

Vered: I think it’s really interesting that giving to BIPOC and LGBTQ+ organizations grew in 2023 according to the 2023 CCS Philanthropic Landscape report. I sense that identity-based philanthropy benefits much more from data management that likewise embraces donor identities in a way that promotes their humanity and dignity. After all, if your organization serves queer inner-city youth but your database only tracks the gender options “male,” “female,” and “other,” how aligned is your DEI data strategy with your organizational mission? That’s why in that same report CCS recommends developing culturally competent donor cultivation/solicitation approaches. One way this manifests in advancement services is through segmentation: using data fields to divide your donors into categories to develop custom approaches to donor relationships.

But just because you can track something doesn’t mean your donors would like to be categorized that way. The eBook touches on this explicitly, asking: “Just because you can, does it mean you should?”

I can share a real-life example:

I once helped an organization build out their ask strings for direct mail. This was the kind of project where I would typically extrapolate the $10, $25, $50 from raw data and examine individual donors’ prior giving, engagement, and other factors to get the string just right. In discussing their prior formula, I learned that they only used numbers in multiples of five for their ask strings despite a sizable quantity of donors giving $18, $36, or $72.

The organization threw out those “non-standard giving amounts” as noise in the data, but the donors persisted in giving those amounts. I quickly pointed out that these donors were likely Jewish, and giving in multiples of 18 was a cultural norm for them. They were not just randomly giving these numbers to break the data model!

We carefully pulled out those donors, and instead of offering the $10, $25, or $50 ask strings, we built ask strings in multiples of 18. Over two years, engagement from these donors went up. They were more likely to answer phone calls, more likely to return an appeal with a check, and their giving increased over the two years I was with the client.

Cultural competency is critical for fundraising success

Explore DEI best practices in Advancement Services in aasp’s 2024 eBook, and learn more about CCS Fundraising’s Systems & Change Management services.

More Insights

Article

Your Guide to Finding, Engaging, and Retaining the Next Donor Generation

May 13, 2024

The future of philanthropy revolves around engaging our next generation of donors—Generation Z and Millennials. Understanding how to attract, retain, and grow your young professional pipeline will ensure long-term sustainability for your organization.

Publication

CCS Philanthropy Pulse

February 15, 2024

CCS’s annual Philanthropy Pulse report provides nonprofits with helpful data to navigate the ever-evolving philanthropic space.